Module Code
ARP3089
In this module, we will look at a range of often controversial arguments within and outside Archaeology and Palaeoecology, and focus on ways of reasoning and logical fallacies within those arguments. Topics discussed include ‘fringe’ science where a degree of archaeology is involved, such as the so-called ‘crystal skulls’ or the existence of giants or extremely long-lived humans as supposedly documented within religious texts, but also wider debates using Earth-(pseudo)science such as the age of the Earth, supposed evidence for a global flood, flat Earth, chemtrails and global warming denial.
While discussing these topics, we will look at the nature of arguments made, and identify logical fallacies. We will also look at hypothesis testing. It is hoped that this module will equip the students with enhanced capabilities to apply critical thinking during and after their studies.
On successful completion of this module, the student will:
- have acquired knowledge on lines of reasoning
- have applied critical thinking to a range of topics inside and outside archaeology
- be able to identify logical fallacies in arguments
• Written and oral self-expression
• Group work
• Website investigation
• Time management
• Critical thinking
None
Coursework
50%
Examination
0%
Practical
50%
20
ARP3089
Autumn Semester
12 Weeks